This post has been updated and archived here.
One of my favorite things about my current job is that, despite being a contingent position, it has given me license to start thinking about the types of courses I might want to teach and provided a framework in which to conceive of them. As last semester wore down I started to mull over what I would assign for an 8-week summer graduate course on Greek history.
(An actual course would probably have to be “ancient history” or somesuch, more broadly construed, but indulge me here.)
The imagined audience for this course is aspiring history teachers with little or no background in the classical languages. My goal was to construct a reading list that a) gives a glimpse at some of what I see as core issues to Greek history as they emerge in recent scholarship, b) challenges traditional narratives about Greek history, and c) avoids leaning too hard on literary or linguistic analysis.
This is the reading list I came up with:
- Johanna Hanink, The Classical Debt (Harvard: 2017)
- Naoise Mac Sweeny, Foundation Myths and Politics in Ancient Ionia (Cambridge: 2013)
- Stephen Hodkinson, Property and Wealth in Classical Sparta (Duckworth: 2000)
- David Yates, States of Memory (Oxford: 2019)
- Rebecca Futo Kennedy, Immigrant Women in Athens (Routledge: 2014)
- Kostas Vlassopoulos, Greeks and Barbarians (Cambridge: 2013)
- John Hyland, Persian Interventions (Johns Hopkins: 2017)
- Paul Kosmin, The Land of the Elephant Kings (Harvard: 2014)
I particularly wanted to avoid any book that used as its focus one of the big wars in Greek history because those books abound, though I did consider Jenny Robert’s The Plague of War (Oxford: 2017), and, I was likewise leery of any book that too completely centered Athens, though Joan Connelly’s The Parthenon Enigma (Penguin: 2014). Rather, I wanted to steer into persistent misunderstandings about Ancient Greece, giving the (imagined) students material that they were likely going to be unfamiliar with and that they might be able to use in how they teach the subject. This meant books that situated events they might see elsewhere in a broader context or inverted what they might have learned elsewhere.
Two issues with this list as currently constructed:
First. Kosmin’s volume feels to me like a token Hellenistic book that might be better to given over to something like Clara Bosak-Schroeder’s Other Natures (University of California Press: 2020) or another book on historiography. I ultimately excluded Other Natures just because I haven’t had a chance to read it yet.
Second. Slavery appears in these volumes as a secondary consideration rather than as the primary focus. Given the prominence of slavery in Greek society this might be a grave oversight.
Finally, a request. Tell me why any of my choices won’t work and, in the sense that I am always looking for bibliography, tell me what I missed.